"subatomic physics"? Wow! Pretty complex stuff! Just cannot see the Intelligent design behind it? Looks like chaos? Really?

Japan is a racially and culturally homogeneous country. And the deeply embedded culture of the Japanese encourages honor and respect for one's relationships - both those of the family and the community. Shaped by both Shintoism and Buddhism, their beautifully refined culture encourages a tacit understanding of life as a thing of timeless, eternal value.

Not sure who made the statement "not being Christian equates to no morals" but it is simply is not true and no real Christian would say something like that. I wish the self-proclaimed Christians on this message board would stop making true Christianity look bigoted and stupid by their false self-righteous statements that clearly contradict the teachings of Jesus Christ.

"If not being Christian equates to no morals," I do not think the Japanese are mostly atheists, and they have a deep respect for others. Many so called "Christians" are not at all "Christ-like", as they harbor deep-seated hatred for others. Many give no thought or concern over their tax dollars killing and maiming millions of innocents in the Middle East, forcing millions to flee their homeland, where their cities have been pulverized into body parts stench rubble. The rejection of "Love your neighbor as yourself" explains the murder and mayhem in our families, cities and nations. At this rate nuclear winter is around the corner. I have hope in God for His assistance, but atheists? But even they learn to pray "in a fox hole".

I can, and do BELIEVE that an AWESOME GOD, beyond and outside of creation gifted us with a chance for eternal bliss with Him, if we can pass a test by choosing love over hatred during the few years He gives us. Evolutionists BELIEVE, that instead of a great God, chaos somehow created beauty, love and truth. Sorry, I do not have enough faith to believe such nonsense. All the accidents I have ever witnessed or read about cause havoc or death. Gambling joints make billions from those who believe that "chance" can have positive results.

No. Life can become more complex over time through evolution. Cell stick together, forming multicellular organisms. Genes are duplicated and evolve new functions. Selective pressures keep benefiting species who evolve new traits to cope with environmental stressors.

"Life is full of beautiful creatures, past and present, each of which are full of beautiful traits."

Subjective statement with no sceintific merit.

"Any proposed explanation for the existence of said beautiful creatures must be able to explain the origin of said beautiful traits."

Traits, and how they came to be, of many creatures beautiful or otherwise are well understood and explained. So much so, there is no doubt, as multiple lines of evidence support the same conclusions.

"This clearly requires the creation of specified complexity."

This is an unsupported statement phrased as an argument to incredulity. You have provided no evidence to discount a natural explanation, only your personal feelings.

"Darwinian evolution, which proposes to explain the entire history of life, requires the creation of specified complexity where there was none."

This is a made up definition of what you want evolution to be so that you pigeonhole it into a container you can dishonestly manipulate.

Evolution is a theory that describes the development of life over time. There is ample evidence to support it, and no evidence to refute it.

Darwinian evolution does not address abiogenisis. However, life has been created from non-life in the lab. The fundamental building blocks of life have been created from constituent chemicals and energy. Irreducible complexity is a red herring that has been repeatedly studied and explained.

You are free to believe in whatever magic you like, but magic isn't science, and has no place in scientific discourse, or classrooms. To get magic involved in scientific conversations, you have to demonstrate its empirical existence through evidence, observations and experiment.

By all means, please continue to attack and expose flaws in scientific research, as that is one of the main ways to refine and improve the theories.

It's funny because there's lots of talk in science about how humans *haven't* adapted to discoveries in medicine. There are huge swaths of scientific research dedicated to health issues that are only present in the developed world, where these discoveries in sanitation and medicine have completely shaped our environment. We aren't equipped to grow up in environments where everything's been sanitized. That's why you see issues like allergy, autoimmunity, IBD, and many related conditions only in the developed world. We don't face the same infections and parasites we did for most of human evolution, and our immune systems often have trouble coping with the current environment.

The existence of God. Theists hope they are right about God existing and believe it does no matter the evidence. Atheists look at the world and see no evidence that there is a God or a divine plan, but wish there was (allegedly).

Feel free to provide links to the peer-reviewed studies that demonstrate atheist have "deep psychological issues."

If you check the fossil record, you see that they evolved from something else, and that the process is still ongoing.
Evolution in no way insists something comes out of nothing. It posits that all life on Earth originated from a single ancestral organism. How life first arose is abiogenesis, not evolution.

So, in other words, you have no idea what the theory of evolution asserts.

What was the beneficial purpose of polio? The 2004 Indian tsunami?

Though I do agree with you about there being laws we are slowly discovering. But nothing we have found necessitates the existence of gods.

I'm guessing you have some form of a learning disability, Sorrythatyouasked, as there's nothing in Dr. Marks' article which attempts to use video games to disprove evolution. It is the evolutionists who are using video games. Dr. Marks is merely pointing out how silly notion is, while also pointing out that what the video game alleges to show isn't even evolution in the Darwinian sense.

Apologize for your error, and see your way to the exit, please.

An engineer, no less. And yet, Bill Nye gets no end of grief for supposedly speaking outside of his area of expertise.